Wired Youth: Science Forum

<< Background >>Declining trust in European democratic institutions and disengagement of young people from policymaking processes pose a threat to the future of a healthy democracy. Recognising this critical need, the Wired Youth: Science Forum project offered an opportunity to bridge this gap. By directly connecting young people with scientists and policymakers, the project addressed several needs:-Empowering youth: By equipping participants with the tools for effective debate and presentation of policy recommendations, the project empowered them to make their voices heard and contribute to rebuilding trust in democratic institutions.-Strengthening democracy: The project fostered active citizenship by facilitating direct engagement with scientists and policymakers. This interaction provided participants with a deeper understanding of the importance of evidence-based policymaking and the role of citizen participation in a healthy democracy.-Enhancing employability: The project fostered a connection between young people, STEM professionals and policy makers. This exposure has the potential to inspire future generations to pursue careers in science and policy.<< Objectives >>The project had the following objectives:O1: Political participation and dialogue with decision-makers towards the improvement of democracy, rule of law and values of youths.O2: Empowering young people and increasing their employability.O3: Strengthening awareness of decision making and policies in youths and instilling in them the importance of evidence based policy-making.O4: Providing a platform for youths with an interest in communication, active citizenship and policy making.O5: Promoting a culture of democratic debates and enhancing rhetorical skills in youths. By achieving these objectives, the project aimed to empower youths to become: a. Active citizens: The project equipped young people with the skills and confidence to engage with decision-makers, fostering a culture of democratic debate.b.Potential future policymakers and scientists: The project exposed participants to STEM professionals and policy makers, making these careers more relatable and potentially inspiring future generations to pursue careers in these critical fields.c. Informed and engaged voters: The project increased awareness of democratic processes and policymaking, empowering participants to become active and informed voters.<< Implementation >>The project included the following activities:a. Workshops (4 sessions, 4 hours each):Meeting the researchers: Facilitated direct interaction with AI researchers to introduce AI concepts.Meeting the policymakers: Provided first hand insights into the policymaking process from policy makers.Public speaking: Equipped participants with the confidence and skills to effectively communicate their ideas.Critical thinking and debating skills: Allowed participants to critically analyse information, construct well-reasoned arguments, and to engage in constructive debates.b. Bootcamp:This 2-day bootcamp solidified the skills acquired during the workshops. Participants focused on constructing logical arguments and rebuttal strategies.c. National debate:Participants had the opportunity to engage in a simulated parliamentary debate on the effects of AI on ethics, jobs and education.d. International debate:Participants engaged in an international debate with their Maltese/Greek counterparts, fostering cultural exchange and discussing AI topics from diverse perspectives.e. Final conference:The project culminated in a final conference, where participants presented the policy recommendations they formulated throughout the project.<< Results >>The following outputs were generated:a. Resolution booklets: Participants created 3 resolution booklets with policy recommendations on AI's impact on jobs, ethics, and education, which they presented to the Speaker of the House of Representatives in Malta during the parliamentary debate.b. Peer-reviewed publication: A paper on the project's methodology, findings, and implications was submitted to an open-access, peer-reviewed journal, ensuring wide reach to researchers and policymakers.c. Policy paper: A policy paper translating the young people's AI resolutions into actionable recommendations was written and will be sent to Maltese members of parliament in the coming days.d. Best practice toolkit: A best practice toolkit was created to help youth organisations replicate the project and extend its benefits beyond the initial participants.The project evaluation showed that more young people felt informed about government decisions affecting their lives, indicating improved critical thinking skills.Feedback from questionnaires and interactions was positive. Participants reported a better understanding of AI, increased confidence in debating and public speaking, and found the project valuable and enriching.