<< Background >>With the pandemic period and the start of distance education, student activities shifted to distance education. By working with SEN students not only individually but also in the classroom, education had become much more difficult not only for older children but especially for primary school children and SEN students. It was the aim this project to enable teachers (working with SEN students with SEN students in the classroom and working teachers in general) to diversify their subject, making it attractive and interesting. It is the teachers who are involved in this project and after the project they have tools and knowledge to create interactive lessons tailored to the students, their ability, the current health problems. The working teacher knows the current situation best, therefore, by being able to modify the tasks and activities, the educational process will be more interesting and attractive for the student. That is what our project adressed. << Objectives >>The project aligned with priorities, addressing the impact of COVID on global education. It aimed to empower teachers, especially in integrating technology for students with learning disabilities.1.Supporting Teachers and School StaffThe project focused on enhancing teachers' competence in integrating technology for effective online learning, particularly for students with learning difficulties.2.Development of Key CompetencesAcknowledging the importance of digital competence, especially among older teachers, the project aimed to bridge the gap by offering targeted programs for teachers and contributing to students' key competences.In conclusion, the project aimed to address the needs of teachers and students amidst the challenges of COVID, empowering teachers for effective digital integration and fostering holistic development in education.<< Implementation >>The 24-month work plan was meticulously organized with partners collaboratively preparing for application submission, defining roles, and scheduling activities. While specific partners led each activity, collective responsibility was shared for implementation, support, and evaluation.The methodology involved:1.Translational Project Meetings: Four 2-day meetings with predetermined locations and objectives. The kick-off meeting outlined administrative processes.2.Communication: Ongoing through emails, WhatsApp, Google Meet, and phones. A common space on platforms like GoogleDrive stored relevant information.3.Monitoring and Evaluation: Internal continuous monitoring and evaluation, with responsible partner (KPDoNE) ensuring quality assurance.4.Dissemination Activities: Led by ITE (P3), involving the General Dissemination Strategy, national plans, and various activities promoting project outcomes.5.Intellectual Outputs:oDIGIT4SEN Instructional Guide: Developed based on target group needs.oe-Learning Training Course: Included trial training and a pool of digital educational materials.6.One Joint Staff Training: Hosted by UAB “ERUDITO” in Lithuania.7.Trial Training Course (O2): Involving teachers/SEN staff with feedback guiding product improvements.8.Pool of Digital Educational Materials (O3): Developed as part of the project.Looking back, the organized work plan and collaborative efforts ensured successful project execution, contributing to digital education goals and sustained impact.<< Results >>PR1_DIGI4SEN Instructional Guide; PR2_E-LEARNING TRAINING COURSE; PR3_ DIGIT4SEN digital library.Also, multiplier events.
